When a Full DAM Actually Makes Sense (And When It Doesn’t)

Digital Asset Management platforms aren’t bad products. They’re just often used in the wrong situations.

When a DAM does make sense

A full DAM is usually the right choice if you have:

  • Hundreds of thousands of assets

  • Many people uploading files daily

  • Formal approval workflows

  • Compliance or legal requirements

  • A dedicated DAM administrator

In short: complexity on both sides of the system. If that’s your reality, a DAM is probably worth the investment.

When a DAM becomes friction

For many teams, the reality looks very different:

  • A small marketing team

  • A finite set of brand assets

  • Infrequent uploads

  • Lots of external sharing

In this case, a DAM introduces:

  • More process than necessary

  • More maintenance than value

  • More confusion than clarity

The tool becomes heavier than the problem.

Choosing the right model

The question isn’t: “Is a DAM good or bad?”

It’s: “What problem are we actually solving?”

If the main challenge is distribution and consistency, not internal production, a simpler solution often works better. The best system is the one that fits your actual workflow — not the one with the longest feature list.


Not sure which approach fits your team?

If you’re deciding between a DAM and something simpler, we’re happy to help you think it through — honestly.

Previous
Previous

How Agencies Can Share Brand Assets Without Building Custom Portals

Next
Next

What a “Brand Portal” Actually Is (And Why It Works)