Why “User Licenses” Make No Sense for Brand Assets

Brand assets exist to be used. So why are so many asset platforms priced like internal productivity tools?

Assets don’t belong to a team — they belong to the brand.

Logos, photos, and templates aren’t just for marketing. They’re used by:

  • Sales

  • Partners

  • Agencies

  • Vendors

  • Press

  • Franchisees

Charging per user assumes a closed system. Brand distribution is the opposite.

User limits discourage sharing

When access has a cost, teams start gatekeeping:

  • “Do they really need access?”

  • “Let’s just send the file”

  • “We’ll add them later”

The result? Assets spread everywhere except the system you’re paying for.

Brand access should be frictionless

The best brand experiences happen when:

  • Access is simple

  • Sharing is intentional

  • The system fades into the background

One link beats ten logins every time.

A flat model aligns with real usage

Pricing per portal instead of per user:

  • Encourages proper sharing

  • Removes permission anxiety

  • Matches how assets are actually used

Brand consistency improves when access is easy — not restricted.


Brand assets aren’t an internal tool

If your assets are meant to be shared, access should be simple. We price per portal, not per user — so sharing never feels like a workaround.

Previous
Previous

What a “Brand Portal” Actually Is (And Why It Works)

Next
Next

The Hidden Cost of “Just Asking for the Logo”